November and has been too. The tropics are sad and here one Friday night as Aníbal , I think of the new technologies. Strictly speaking, in the cultural problems they generate.
The writing in these blogs of non-modernity has some capacity to abolish the findings and the proper limits of social existence. That is, you can cross that particular position in the social structure of the writer.
time ago suggested some categories of analysis for thinking facebook or what I call the dream of Narcissus. If you have been recurring questions that may fade away as I have to scrutinize votes or stay hoarse by singing Chicano hares. There was a privileged reader of my first note to the magazine Elvernaculo that suggested something that we called "the paralyzing. "Like a charm of the nomination, this conceptualization a priori slept until I came across this post Lucas, which ironically read via facebook.
If there is something that guides our actions is the need justify our social existence, or to put it more simple, find a reason to exist socially. All those properties that might be perceived by other agents as "recognition" are valid in this regard. It happens that to be considered as such, is required that "others" share the same categories of perception.
comes a press release in which it communicates the amount of "fans" that has the profile of someone and it seems that evokes the illusion of Roberto Carlos with a million friends who wanted to have. In this case, the intent of generating the recognition of management and the staff member ended up being classified as a "charade ." Perhaps, for those who share the categories of perception indicates that a larger number of virtual fans (read many clicks) confers a status of importance, this may look like a clown while. But what the recognition is based not know how many fans have facebook?
However, the phenomenon of getting some symbolic capital through clicks than profiles unknown called "friends" or "fans" no longer a question. Assuming the social practices that are carried out in the community's most populous virtual globe as our own to some extent, something that stands out is the light that has acquired the same practices. It turns out that for many of my "friends" (and also their dear reader and eventual commentator) only just "one click to feed a child", another click to resign Cobos, another click for rain in Cordoba, one click to be part of a political party so he could spend the night listing clicks. This is the "paralyzing." Is there a natural part of this practice as a synonym for struggle toward a goal? Could it be that these clicks are perceived as a real action? I want to fool the senses as I usually do and this bothers mistaken perception I have, that I read on many walls of "friends." That says that with each click are militant.
bodies are changing.
Tasting Notes: There are two things to avoid thinking when you read the post of things said and are two concepts that naturalized always brings: the good and bad.
0 comments:
Post a Comment