Good, now I will not comment any drinking game. I know it's disappointing (or not) but today's post is to warn that the author of this blog will start their holiday season on this blog. Once past the holidays will take up the blog with more and more games at the moment will have to survive the holidays with the games already mentioned (which are many) over the 4 months of life blog.
Well then, happy holidays to all and carefully with the excesses that we know:), we see around the holidays!.
Today we will take the card game fashion to the alcohol theme: texas hold'em poker.
First of all we must know how to play Texas, you can start here . If you want more information you can search the web (google does not bite). Well, from here we assume that you know play hold'em poker (or at least You understand the rules, play well and would be another matter), we adapt it to the game.
To play this game need a poker deck (of course) and if we can chip or something like (coins for example). If you do not have tabs for each player to keep track of what you bet we serve. Whatever each tab represents a quarter of a cup (played to rooms to have more room in the betting). The cards are dealt to players (16 can be a good number of chips for each player) and start the game:
The dealer gives two cards to each player, after which the two players to the left of the dealer put one of its chips before him to represent the blind (NOTE: unlike real poker hold'em are the two blinds are of a form, there is no small blind). From this point the game is exactly like real poker, each player bets, fold or check as you see appropriate and do three shifts bets (flop, turn and river).
hand at some point will eventually do because you get to showdown or because all but one players throw their cards. In any case all players who have not won should drink the equivalent of chips wagered vessels (eg 8 chips bet if I drink two cups whole). The player who wins sends drinking equivalent in their chips wagered vessels (NOTE: If a player raises and no one is discounting should raise the sheets when sending).
And that's all, it was not very complicated you see. Next week more and better, until next time!.
drive variant that is played with 9 cups, no idea what it's called so just call it the drive to 9 cups (as original). explain The version below is the most basic, as always there are variations, but here only explain the basic game.
Well, let the subject, we must first put the glasses in an array of 3x3 (yes), picture shows:
Each turn the player flip the coin and removes the training the glass where you put the coin in case of putting the coin into a gap between four glasses together (which would become a center of the normal hard) are eliminated the four vessels that form the center. If indeed the player removes a vessel can keep pulling and removing vessels or spend the next player receiving vessel formation as is (ie without the glasses removed). When a player rolls and fails to remove any vessel is drink all the vessels removed so far (as always recommend drinking means).
"Simple is not?, Well one last thing, if someone manages to remove the last glass of training the player before that player is drunk nine vessels. Ojito penultimate pop the glass and pass the last glass to the next player that can get expensive joke xD.
Well, that's all for today, today's game was really sencillito. More next week, until next time!.
This week we will explain how to convert a classic casino game on one of drink: the roulette.
Well, first we will need a spinner (obviously), if you have a few games together or something like that can you to have one (and possibly not what you knew!). Otherwise you can always do with a wheel at any gift shop, even with a wheel you can become "drinking game" like this photo:
This type of roulette are common in those stores Gifts so you should not have trouble getting a cheaply. The difference between using one of these wheels and use a normal roulette is that the vessels of this "wheel drunk" are "drawn" to correspond to ranges of numbers of roulette and black and red. Well, once we have the wheel whatever we are ready to begin. Then I show three variants of how to use the wheel. ORIGINAL VERSION
If you have the wheel drunk: Each player is assigned one or more vessels, turn the wheel and those whose vessel corresponds to the value on the roll out drunk that vessel, if zero out all drink. In this version we can play well on black / red or at intervals of numbers. Example: Turn the wheel and get a 9, our vessel has 1-12 written so drink the cup.
If you have normal roulette: Similar to the previous case but we assign "mentally" to vessels that correspond to numbers / colors. All vessels must correspond to a range of similar issues when using the digital version of the game. BETTING OPTION
Similar to the previous except that the vessels are assigned to each player, but before the spin each player chooses which cup you use for the next spin.
LAS VEGAS VARIANT
Something more complicated but more fun, first we must bear in mind that here there is no difference between having the "roulette drunk" or normal and not the values \u200b\u200b"drawn" in the vessels. First we need to know the payout of roulette and the appearance of the betting table so that you can bet as ye will (extracted from the wikipedia where you have some more information on the French roulette):
Betting
Numbers playing
Payments
simple luck
18 numbers
1 to 1
columns and dozens
12 issues
2 to 1
Line
6 issues
5 to 1
Table
4 issues
8 to 1
Street
3 numbers
11 to 1
Middle Full
2 numbers
17 to 1
Full
1 number
35 to 1
Paytable
betting board
Before each turn, each player bets on what you want the number of drinks you want (may be several bets at once.) When everyone has bet the roulette wheel turns and players who have no right to be drinking bet. Those who have been successful not only drink but not sent drink payment of your bet. If zero all drink out your bet. As I am explaining fatal (as usual) an example of a round of roulette between 4 players:
Player 1 bet the number 10 1 glass. Player 2 bet on red 2 glasses. Player 3 bet on the dozen 2 cups 1925-1936. Player 4 bets on January 10 to 12 street and the street glass glass 28 to 30 January.
Turn the wheel and out on 30 red, as a result of this: Player 1
drink 1 glass. Player 2 sends drinking 2 (simple luck is paid 1 to 1). Player 3 drink 2 glasses. Player 4 drink 1 glass for its commitment to the road 10-12 and sent 11 (street pays 11 to 1).
Well, that's all for Today, something completely different than usual without a doubt, I hope you have enjoyed this week's game. As a final note that if you have a roulette table and some cards to make the bets of the players and would be the bomb (in the big games you have these components together along with roulette and a shovel). Next week more and better, until next time!.
reflection on own practices is necessary but not sufficient condition for its legitimacy, but today I shot you need.
There's a fine line between the author of his writing. For more than may be apparent similarities allocated between the psudónimo and its author, there is a separation between them. In fact, those like projections called autobiographical esccritura so abundant in the blogs, are really the objectification of the self, that is, his self-analysis. Whenever
Leila type in the form of things said, is producing a separation distance. The very act of writing (it) in stories that other posts reveals a necessary break.
happens that the writing has the ability to abolish the determinations (and damn if it does), cross your own boundaries of social existence itself. These impositions that shape social life away from the pen of the one that is being written.
Yes, there is a fundamental relationship between Leila and Things Such as These Things not is nothing more than that. Posts and comments resulting from the objectification that makes you who exist socially.
variant of the original hard game, it's easy so far today I enrollaré.
Put a full glass of drink in the middle of the table and then surround it half-full glasses (one for each person playing). The vessels can put them all glued to the central vessel (if you are few) or more separate (if you are many), is as everyone should be able to quickly pick up your glass without hindering its rivals if the need arises drink fast (below explain the reason for this.) As shown a picture of variant separate vessels:
Well, once the vessels are ready start the game, the player begins to take their money and pull the strip to one of the vessels, if it gets into the glass of a player that player must drink the cup (this includes the goal of pulling the coin in his cup) if it gets into the central glass all over the world should take a glass, drink it, and say posarlo teen slut, the last to do so takes the cake: drink the central vessel.
Well, this is basic, there is only one thing at any moment someone has to drink another player can challenge the player to drink. To do this the player who wants to challenge and try to pick up his glass and say teen slut drink before that challenges the player, if he does the player was challenged should drink a glass and center, if the player is challenged to drinking his glass and says teen slut before the challenger is the challenger then you drink a glass and the center (I mean evil god). One last thing about this, if people challenge both the last of those involved (challenged and challenging) to read teen slut who should be drinking (ie a person drinks only).
's it, this is the game this week, next week more and better, until next time!.
"Fighting is in some ways, synonymous with living:
the fight is with the pen.
you fight with the sword.
The struggle is not waterproof, as water.
who stagnates, it rots. "
Raúl Scalabrini Ortiz
confess that the last time I recovered obsessive habit traditional reading and therefore I have abandoned the ether of 2.0. That distance of cyberspace was and is both mitigated by the nostalgia of the terms, that where bodies redefine saw? (There are many posts on this blog about the meaningfulness of the bodies into the phenomenon 2.0, but not today write about the topic.) I turned to books and coffee, would be heading.
submitting his own volition sweetened the dictatorship imposed by the TV, I started the week with 6,7,8 in the version on Sunday and appeared this morning's post Artemio to synthesize concerns shared by most of us (and I'm not We sure what here, much less if it is something shared, but sometimes I leave it to type in flowing pure expressions of longing).
In a notebook he dusted off my notes looking for Popular Culture I took the last time Aníbal Ford was in the ECI I found cuts for current analysis of the phenomenon that takes television screen and columns blogger. He said " the advocacy capacity of the media is inversely proportional to the degree of civil organization." There was a point.
abounding long time coming posts on the justification that has the credibility of the media and the skepticism of policy consideration. Again and like everything in this blog, both must be thought of in relational terms. Beliefs are true custodians of those spaces which legitimize our own not-knowing.
That place of belief in policy was shifting towards the media and this is no novelty. Thus the mediation of political discourse (metamorphosis) is one of the most accomplished sample of "form" that accounts for the belief displaced and reframed.
leak occurs belief that he suffered in the field of politics is intimately related with the dismantling of the popular and disruption of organizational politics as a form of society. First it was a terrorist state that blood and weapons disarmed and then a Democracy tends to demobilize. Two contexts are inseparable from what we now produce / circulate / consume or tagg under the label called "Communication / Politics / Culture." I heard and read of Marita Mata long as one of the best examples of this phenomenon: " brought us the popular classes people."
The viewer on the other side of the screen consumes only believe that owns the power because you can choose with the remote control hand. In this lone refuge proposes the screen, accept the reality reflected not only built up the middle. "There is an event one hand and his subsequent statement, but there is no event without enunciation " says Maria Pia Lopez . And so you can understand the attack of the divas (Tinelli, Legrand, Giménez and other relatives of the neoliberal legislation communication policies) occurred in recent weeks.
"Statistics can counter this is" real "for the viewer in terms of insecurity? Do I need out the clash inexorably breaking the aesthetics of television language to destroy the divas? Do I have to respond to attack the game by accepting the "other" (the same you want to battle)?
The policy was until recently dismantled the place of belief after the breakdown of social organization and became a space characterized by the inability. The time is ripe to change the vacuum capacity of intervention in the social sphere was the domestic postal until 2003. I could not type in recipes and political MKT assert the infallibility of the slogan, just because I lack that belief.
In fact, the media are not media. The media are building and manufacturing equipment of discussion with the effect of truth. This notion was not known at all by the Coalition that proposed changing the law by a law audiovisual media services . And was approved but still not a reality because the challenge of making Let All just begun.
Some will say "do the hold" and others that we must "resist" but the real struggle and resist because they hold or control these concepts are the same as we finish. We can not bear not resist because that is how the non-political and the place of no power. Do not react the same thing.
The struggle creates hope, projected makes it real. As Arturo Jauretche said "The people down it is due. So we come to fight for the country's cheerily. Nothing can be done with great sadness" (not wanting to destroy).
Photo: Wall Albaicin in Granada, Spain. Hanging by a "friend" facebook.
role-playing a game together and drink alcohol and we get a very freak game: Anno Domini Drinking Game. Today we're dealing with a unique game in its class, the idea is playing a role, but drinking, well actually not much role to play, but the atmosphere is good there and can always be alliances between players same faction.
rules thay are well explained in the book downloading, will comment here ignore the idea of \u200b\u200bthe game so you can see that it's all about.
Needed 10-sided dice, and one of the dice must be different color. Each player in turn throws the dice and compares the result to a number known as difficulty for each given out under the drinking sends a difficulty, if you leave a 0 in addition to sending one turns to throw the dice.
"Simple is not?, Let's complicate it a bit before saying that we need a different color since this counts as a die as normal but with the odd extra. If you get a zero in this notice how to send two instead of sending one and also put a standard. If you get a 9 in this because we have a punishment that will drink up the vessels that normally Mandarin, in case you can not drink anything because we can not draw any shot short of the number of difficulty because we drink at least one every time someone roll the dice until our next spin.
Well, this is the basic operation, you see role until the thing has nothing, so I need to add an element to the game rolero: powers. In the game there is a list of powers (powers depend on the faction), the game starts, players must choose their faction and power (I recommend randomly selected as explained by the rules) and during the game each player may use his power once per turn.
's it, you see is not as complicated thing, yes, warned that the powers "ARE quite the thing out of hand, here you have the game ready for download, the game credits to their creators are Vetusta & Lazarus Doctor M (according to pray the rules). DOWNLOAD
November and has been too. The tropics are sad and here one Friday night as Aníbal , I think of the new technologies. Strictly speaking, in the cultural problems they generate.
The writing in these blogs of non-modernity has some capacity to abolish the findings and the proper limits of social existence. That is, you can cross that particular position in the social structure of the writer.
time ago suggested some categories of analysis for thinking facebook or what I call the dream of Narcissus. If you have been recurring questions that may fade away as I have to scrutinize votes or stay hoarse by singing Chicano hares. There was a privileged reader of my first note to the magazine Elvernaculo that suggested something that we called "the paralyzing. "Like a charm of the nomination, this conceptualization a priori slept until I came across this post Lucas, which ironically read via facebook.
If there is something that guides our actions is the need justify our social existence, or to put it more simple, find a reason to exist socially. All those properties that might be perceived by other agents as "recognition" are valid in this regard. It happens that to be considered as such, is required that "others" share the same categories of perception.
comes a press release in which it communicates the amount of "fans" that has the profile of someone and it seems that evokes the illusion of Roberto Carlos with a million friends who wanted to have. In this case, the intent of generating the recognition of management and the staff member ended up being classified as a "charade ." Perhaps, for those who share the categories of perception indicates that a larger number of virtual fans (read many clicks) confers a status of importance, this may look like a clown while. But what the recognition is based not know how many fans have facebook?
However, the phenomenon of getting some symbolic capital through clicks than profiles unknown called "friends" or "fans" no longer a question. Assuming the social practices that are carried out in the community's most populous virtual globe as our own to some extent, something that stands out is the light that has acquired the same practices. It turns out that for many of my "friends" (and also their dear reader and eventual commentator) only just "one click to feed a child", another click to resign Cobos, another click for rain in Cordoba, one click to be part of a political party so he could spend the night listing clicks. This is the "paralyzing." Is there a natural part of this practice as a synonym for struggle toward a goal? Could it be that these clicks are perceived as a real action? I want to fool the senses as I usually do and this bothers mistaken perception I have, that I read on many walls of "friends." That says that with each click are militant.
bodies are changing.
Tasting Notes: There are two things to avoid thinking when you read the post of things said and are two concepts that naturalized always brings: the good and bad.
you wake up on Saturday at 7 AM and partis to saws though not understood well what you're going. The day is cold and gray or maybe as you see it after receiving an sms at 5 in the morning that I remembered the party that you were not. There comes a taxi that takes you to the market if you're willing to listen to the chronology of accidents reported minutes before the newspaper Chain 3 while you keep thinking about the party that you were not.
that cigarette smoke almost in aid to the weather. You do not know what your loneliness cove will be the morning wind? Nicotine is it burns your throat flavored toothpaste? Did you ever know what will? You
you climb to the micro and you are about to lose the look in the window even though the Dominican who is sitting next to you takes pains to talk. Today you want to be in the Paris Metro and no one dares to look at you. With your eyes on yourself reach you. Too.
You get to remote mountain villages with little idea where he is awaiting you. The street opens to your left is always the first choice. Caminás signal slope and nominating the passage of land on the mountain says "Arturo Jauretche." And you realize that you do not know nothing and want to know. The manual begins zonceras recited in memory and smile. You appear happy and suddenly a couple of silhouettes walking towards you. And talk about Jauretche Scalabrini Ortiz and lost in a corner of the hill with two figures become partners. You've got so much to know.
One of the features that makes this blog is to hold the style of writing that he proposes. It would not make more sense to draft a post-press release on the visit of Nestor Kirchner to Cordoba, at least not around here. I was there and in that turning of subjectivity makes a difference.
Just as we are, through coffee, seemingly unrelated clicks come from sharing a great story and sometimes even contradictory. If you found my face in people do not need cameras or to objectify relatively chronic.
Days later, some readings provide sustenance to those who feared senses could deceive . Certainly the crowds and the euphoria often conspire to break up the event. And there, one more game than we need to deconstruct.
Who knows why the unconscious rodeo back in 2003 the image of the president-elect who had not voted was associated with the picture that hangs on the wall for years of living. Improvisers pays a compelling sense and so I chose to nominate him to Néstor Kirchner in coffee talks before it is installed on the web do you remember that Primo Louis? On Tuesday, narrowing the gap material, its image a few meters from me again remember that. There was in front of the improviser.
And it happened that instead of linking to the words of those who chose the way he spoke to the surface of the town. It was felt the ability to kick the board of the ruling party after the defeat of 28J. An exercise. Games seduction.
The cyclical active subjects a year ago that served as support to the demands of the apolitical (or non-political, as you prefer) begin to blur with the defeated ruling party strategy to remain who dominates the game. It is no longer a bad memory these speculations on the New Subject autoconvocados Agricultural and Rabbi Bergman, do not cover a block of TN. That is autoconsagró as "the field" is diluted as those who worship the golden calf of the non-modernity.
With the adoption of the Law on Audiovisual Communication Services (Act SCA) is eroding the real mask who held the media focused on the country and promises that the construction of that reality is different. And now demand more and to reach agreements. But (the inevitable but my posts) ...
SCA Under the new law will soon be regulated to open horizons to be arriving. That is, the objective conditions of the field may be other media. That may be. This potential is given by the ability to turn what should be proper to conduct background in something that is, ontology.
demand a law that everyone talk held by countless organizations and lectures, debates, forums were superimposed on the agenda of anyone who wanted to participate. Supporting events overwhelm the law achieved (ie become vassal) to the mass media and even took over the public space. The party is over. There is no reason to "do the hold" much less to move to the "resistance", two terms that may be appropriate for political discourse on running.
In 2003, the annulment of laws full stop and due obedience opened a space that was summarized in the tables withdrawal Board Hall of ESMA but would not remember that symbol if there were no justice makers today Menendez took to the bench again. Because justice is not justice is done. The laws become important void in each trial, each gear 24 and in each revival of the theory of the two demons that we never resign. That struggle or hold or resist, this struggle creates hope, designs, makes it real.
Surf Now we come to build the party against the other we demoralized and depressed as we did so well in the 90's. The possibilities are within reach it only remains real.
I post. That which has the smile that draws you own when you see two lovers grandparents go hand in hand to build the front of his Jauretche. That of children quietly on someone's shoulders watching the screen with the bewildered face of Nestor Kirchner. That same account frustrated attempt to sing the march from the crowd. Yes, this post maybe I owe him forever.
This is another post that was written late at night when a party waned. This post also speculated about possible deals between warlords or crumbles Accastello speeches and Kirchner.
5:00 a.m. I'm late for my routine of reading newspapers and smoking the last cigarette of the day. Restraint in the local newspaper titles may be confused with the denial of the obvious. The second trial began, an event called the genocidal vengeance and insecurity. The strategy begins by nominating.
(...) "I grew up with Donald Duck with Disney. Or now I have to stifle Donald Duck?" (...) Deputy Miguel Heredia.
(...) "My dog \u200b\u200bbecomes a famous lifeguard and my nephews will Brigadiers-General. What greater honor can aspire to a man?" Donald Duck at Disneyland (...) No. 422
(...) Only from another way of conceiving the world can be assigned a value to change the structures. Conversely, uncritical acceptance of established cultural norms, it means the consecration of the world inherited . Although is worth repeating, has changed hands property losmedios production. What matters is the functioning of the structure and not their alleged content: the pattern is one or the other, that the administrator is employed by a private company or state, does not change, no more, the relationship that down to production workers. The qualitative concerns the characteristics that this relationship, culture that was generated from the concrete forms of existence that tends to increasing participation from all around . (...) Nothing escapes ideology. nothing for, so escapes class struggle. Is it necessary to add that this is not Donald take the case as if it were the enemy? Donald is the metaphor of bourgeois thought that passes insensibly in children through all channels of formation of mental structure. It is the symbolic manifestation of a culture that structures their meanings about gold and how innocent to detach from its social function. If the capital is such as constitutes a social relationship, the gold accumulated by a miser as Uncle Rico has no responsibility. Is neutral. Money does not appear as an element of relationship between a capitalist society and therefore liable to injustices (...) Hector Schmucler - Donald and Politics in How to Read Donald Duck and A. A. Mattelart Dorffman .
After 16 hours on the futon watching TN and Twitter is not easy to start a post. Expected to contrast the views of the Lower House session with speeches at the March of the Night of the Pencils today, but everything changed. Sometimes you have to shuffle and deal again.
In general, the readings on the law audiovisual media services abound in a sort of stigma about the concentration of media ownership in Argentina with a strong rebuke to a key player in this dispute: Clarín. From the iconic phrase of Nestor Kirchner "Clarín what's wrong, you're nervous (?)" Some bets headed toward Mordor without knowing how to attack (let alone how to defend). This sentence was at the same time, played by actors with conflicting interests and its aim was varied until the 28J.
(...) "Nominate involves doing something to exist because the social value of language is organized within the system of differences and these differences are social (...) said in a melancholy post written from the balcony a few weeks ago. Questioning and challenging the quasi war of former Argentine President Grand Journal was perhaps one of the causes of defeat because Clarín turned into an enemy. Thus, in the same way but on a smaller scale is what can happen with any legal action to collective blog QTPC .
Interestingly, a retrospective of Kirchner ( assuming it exists) gives a number of cases in which logic is developed similarly. As recalled by Louis in a comment Primo "the nominator dominates" Humpty Dumpty say but the word "domination" can not be read unless it is in relational form.
kirchnerismo declarative capacity (with different nuances depending on the stage for an analysis) reports an ongoing commitment that is reflected in creating monsters, Frankensteins uncontrollable. There are many, some spooky, other somewhat lethargic at the moment but we are interested in this post is Clarín.
What happens to Clarín?
in shaping modern societies the mass media constitute a space / place privileged autoconsagrada fulfill the function of "monitoring" and "make believe" at the same time. The actions of the media, are called they are called, are "live" so naturalized and is part of the objective conditions. The role of "control" exercised not to be questioned rather than because historically Academy papers can be sustained as "power" that monitors the state.
As agents compete for respect, they are position of advantage over others who clearly are giving position. Similarly, the map of media currently in force in our country, characterized by the concentration of ownership in few hands and the imprint of Grupo Clarin is not questioned because again, is "naturalized."
SCA law is the result of a sustained commitment from the return of democracy as a specific demand (willingness of universality against the system) can not be reduced to a dispute between two powers. Focus the purpose of the law in a lawsuit against an absurd economic group's particular cultural re-create a Frankenstein monster that can not be controlled. In this sense "No hitting Clarin is to guide action towards other hand, symbolic but also highly constructive (versus destructive). And that came as the political and erotic drive, for those who want to throw a couple of comments from the couch .
Tasting Notes: It is suggested to accompany this post with this other and comment on both.
every day I must admit that I like to read La Voz del Interior, the local newspaper that encouraged the Docta lines and increases low Grupo Clarín. Even now I revel in not only the official team notes and blogs but also gives me a special pleasure to read that tickets for guests opinólogos editorial section, all people who are indisputable leader in the field on which type (?). The
This morning, the editorial note was entrusted to Miguel Pérez Gaudio , a vernacular that was able to mount the business of college Trejo y Sanabria, known around here as the CUP. Beyond the biographical sketch of this character, which undoubtedly will be contributed by readers, what struck me was his ontological conception of communication. The note entitled " The immaturity of the Policy is broadcasting law" (take) to say about the Bill audiovisual media services :
time ago here are some thoughts by issues relating to the projected demand Clarín initiated by a simple blog. The importance of the status of "enemy", the meanings of the complaint and others, especially key to the impending law SCA.
I believe in building a "we" who can distinguish themselves and position themselves in this system of relationships, something not simple to get (the more complex the how) but I can not stop thinking about the chronicle of events that makes Nathaniel, who gets the brunt.
Tuesday between Weber and Houtondji after I reconciled with the futon this weekend. One of the unintended consequences of the televising of football for all I need one more day to get in touch with reality. Now, start looking for excuses to get out of here only on Tuesday.
time ago commented on the blog of Gary the mass media were not supporting the claims of the opposition. Yes, just as it reads. What they were doing the mass media was exploiting the opposition's claims because they were functional at their own game. All this circumlocution can be summarized as "the media play their own game."
The continuous reference to the theories of the media in this blog, do not need to repeat questions concerning the constitution of the media as agents naturalization of their actions, ability to create meanings, public opinion (note, I believe that there closely) and others. Thus, certain speculations as the new subject land if we begin to blur as the unit of analysis covers the newspapers or TV news.
As I became reconciled with the futon, I sandwiched the time spent on line with zappings television. It was no surprise to appreciate the revival of morbidity that crams headlines: "kidnapping" / "stealing" / "assault" / "kids jets" = INSECURITY. This specific concept of media holdings is only the naturalization of "do not kill me / I do not steal / not violate me" the three pillars on which rests the idea of \u200b\u200bthe public. (Quite apart from the Safety and farther still from the contributions of social theory). Between blood, bull and police reports, the central issue is the dispute over the information that we know as Proposed Bill Aud Communication Services iovisual (SCA or law to the cumpas ) .
The ability to generate an agenda is undoubtedly a sense dispute. FPV managed to reposition itself with a couple of measures in recent weeks and install the theme (this and other related). That means, the ideal agents for the construction of meaning, spend much of their production to speak of "government project" should be read as an outgrowth of interest rather than interpreted as apocalyptic.
While watching Cristina Fernandez's speech on Thursday on Channel 7 remembered a few phrases of conflict in the 125 (which for me is not the conflict with the field). I knew somewhere to write about the construction of the group to which he addressed as "you Argentines." The president has plenty of parliamentary arena and that habitus is often a consideration.
few days ago I feel like I'm there but I'm here. Balcony, sun, bikini and fruit juice in the morning in the middle of the city as if in Sampa (yes, an advertisement clight). Strange when Algumas coisa no meu Coração happens and you realize that you can not take the subway to here to take one of these books .
leave a small part in this week movidito-movidito . The bold is mine (how nice it is read in other pens)
Alguns Lança months before the First National Conference on Communication, the book "The dictatorship of the media" (São Paulo, Editora Anita Garibaldi / Red Association, 2009) has many ideas and proposals that will result in the need and the desirability of that evento.Depois make a historical survey on the concentration of media for world interests and values \u200b\u200bof the dominant classes, and their firepower in the hands of a few companies and / or family oligarchies (particular case of Brazil), and many of his interventions always unfavorable to popular causes, the author, Altamiro Borges, and presents a detailed list of proposals for consideration by the Conference: 1) Strengthen public broadcasting;
2) Review the criteria for awards;
3) Revise the criteria of official advertising;
4 ) stimulate (rather than repress) a community broadcasting;
5) Investing in digital inclusion.
6) Define a new regulatory framework for communications, curbing monopolization, the denationalization and securing "public policies that guarantee access the population to technological advances. " The author points out that the last "boldest initiative in this field [public broadcasting] was in the government of Getulio Vargas to the creation of the National Radio, which had a significant audience." It also emphasizes that the creation of Brazil Communications Company (EBC), "which manages the TV Brazil, eight radio stations and a news agency signaled a shift from government [Lula]" . Departing from his previous timidity in facing the media oligarchy, which suffered after the bombing to prevent the reelection of President in 2006, the government Would I be wanting to distance themselves from these "allies" of yesteryear who are constantly trying to make holes in the hull of your barco.Um of the most interesting chapters of the book is the IV, "De Vargas to Lula , stories press manipulation" in which you see the oligarchic power of the media to continuously expand its reach and possibility of political manipulation through new technologies as they arise, until the culmination of a concerted attempt in different vehicles to reverse the expected reelection of President in 2006, denounced maneuver, as pointed out by Professor A. Venício Lima in the book "The media in elections 2006 "(New York: Perseus Abramo Foundation, 2007. Page 17), the first letter in this major, with reports from Bia Barbosa, and the sequence of the materials Raimundo Pereira in Carta Capital. In the preface of" The dictatorship of media, "says Professor Lee that" a major obstacle to the democratization of media has been the historical difficulty that most of the population try to understand the media as a power and communication as a right .
The power of great media in the contemporary world has been characterized precisely because she is so intertwined in the social environment that can 'Go unnoticed', naturalized, as if there were. " other words, the mainstream media disguises himself as "transparent" is in the intention to report information on an "objective", "neutral", in terms of representing the "public interest." To this I add another chameleon character , which is the stubborn inability to see the information as a commodity produced, capable of adding other, through advertising, to induce the consumption of still others, and to add services and / or favors in the form of handouts from the state to itself same. The general public, and not left differ in particular, can actually have a perception of media outlets - newspaper or magazine in individual paper, television or electronic apparatus (the apparatus of production, transmission and reception, etc.). as goods, but not the actual information. course it is very difficult because the information is not an "object", it is rather a stream contained in small particles, are the letters or forms printing, words and styles of digitized audio-visual transmission, etc.. But its production, circulation and consumption relate to the rules a peculiar market, yet market, where producers want to appear to be always serving the interests of consumers, and not of their own. More or less as in car production, soap or gum. This creates a peculiar fetishism of the commodity information, she shines as if life itself, was a value in itself and not return to such an extent that the absence of the object-newspaper, for example, can provoke a withdrawal (whether esteemed newspaper, detested, despised or all at once) so severe in the reader about the lack of a drug addict for it. Merchandise well-hidden information to their own nature merchandise, from the idea that she has only one use-value, being a "reproduction" of an authoritative "reality" even when this is only the opinion columnists individuals, as in the mainstream media they often present themselves speaking for semantic vector (more simply subjects / objects) abstract, as "the voter," "consumers," the reader ", and increasingly rarely " the citizen ", that word was sent to the bottom of gaveta.O Altamiro book is interesting reading and obviously interested. I have only one critical observation of nature (After all, this is also the office of the reviewer), he often refers to America as "the evil empire." It is clear that the expression has a sense of ironic gloss the phrase "axis of evil", as embodied in the Bush administration in relation to North Korea, Iran and Iraq. But its repeated repetition gives forum concept, and so ambiguously in the air makes the suggestion (certainly unintentional) that there might be an "empire of good." Finally, it also leaves open a question. The union's strategic interests of oligarchic media in Brazil over their competition on a daily basis, is increasingly strong, close and clear. However, despite numerous forums, meetings, declarations, the Left and their media alternatives are even further - as always been historically - in front of coordinating joint action and synergy. This is another issue which, although not explicitly on the agenda of the Conference I will determine your results as it is forward or stagnate.
Ya serán los Sundays on as before. Derecho a la breathe alegría en la calle o en el aire (de la Public TV). Sin embargo, algunas rutin is mantienen. Los mañanas of Sunday did not fit on the clock. I wake up around noon and read the daily paper. I will not alter customs. Coffee, croissants, cigarettes in the sun on a sidewalk downtown enjoying every inch of the role that spot.
I have a few hours of sleep under my belt but that does not stop me read line by line with the memory of Página/12 , the newspaper I read between 00 and 01 in the morning and it is on line. Workshops caravans passed to the "boutique" while I delight with the publishers of The Voice. These are notes that I like, yeah. That passion flows, is left to savor.
look up and drown in your eyes. No is more than erotic drive like you are playing this week in Congress. And yes, I also talk about politics.
For them, "everything will remain the same, but worse" as the owner chose the central note of Opinion.
Writing has become a habit for recognition as so many others who would not have.
3:00 AM. Álvaro once told me long ago that this time would come to stay. That moment of desolate street where you can hear the bandoneon and the tears come without permission. And sometimes, as in the songs of our childhood, the bandoneon "not seen."
3:11 a.m.. I light another cigarette and I miss the look on the balcony of the valley that tastes like cinnamon and an open wound hurts. And I think of going because for those who do not know, I'm just someone who is always going.
3:15 a.m.. The assumptions on non-diluted modernity. I have a couple of letters to write and a couple of projects by tapping. The obligations are for Sunday, including River to watch the game because the rights become obligations.
In the previous posts had been sharing some ideas on the communication (sometimes reveal the true heart of my posts). Said new terms were needed, to define their own concepts as certain practices that concern us in the blogs. And yes, it may be reprehensible not to answer the comments: I know that it is expected that a fluid dialogue but (but inevitable) part of it is that, to generate an opening in the conversation of many more voices than the 'owner "for each blog. The position of one who writes a post and who says it is not the same. The individual blogger who posts payroll and we know what it says about Dumptey Huptey. In the same vein, I would say that nominating means doing something there because the social value of language is organized within the system of differences and these differences are social.
3:24 a.m.
. I hope so because I am also someone who waits. Could have written about the new ruling party bets after seeing a Caffiero in Canal Encuentro.
From the legal actions initiated by the great Argentine daily (you may use the slogan?) Against the blog "What's wrong Clarin (QTPC) shot a series of postings related to freedom of expression, censorship and all that could be related to a massed done mainly by the "subjects bloggers." And yes, I came a new concept.
Living in the south column, we raised this issue with Tux and did the debate about what were the limits of the claim made on account of the use of the mark and the logotype to create a blog that a critique of Clarín. In fact, as can be seen in audio, the case has enough flaws that underlie the claim of media company. The right perspective is interesting, but (there's always a but) the order of conduct is often a path parallel to the ontological and that's the reason I left the cloisters of that power long ago.
The sentence that opens Camilo José Cela his book The Hive says: (...)" not lose perspective, I'm already tired of saying, is all that matters "(...). Although I read it over 10 years is one of the phrases that I always remember it is because if there is something that I lose perspective.
Then, knowing the law as explained by speculations this post we venture into perspective: What's wrong is an allusion Clarín newspaper unavoidable but we know that newspapers are nothing more than media companies. In the current field of what we call media, defined by the balance of power characteristics of the 22,285 and the successive reforms to the Decree 527, is not very simple new players emerging. Some time ago said that the reality of blogging in the case of Argentina should be exemplary and that the map of media companies today was a breeding ground for the emergence of alternative spaces (objective conditions). Occurs NOTICE that if we talk about capital letters, it is known that the means of mass communication misnamed (lower case) now wield dual auto-consecrated to "make believe" and "monitor", are spokespersons for a single, hegemonic sense to it's not as easy sneak. Perhaps as an attempt to construct reality and the event, some individuals or small groups echoed the proposal of Deleuze and generate true "holes" by leaking the unique discourse of the media.
As Polycarp says when he speaks of " streisand effect, the legal maneuvering Clarín understood as a commitment creates a space for the emergence of another bet, step up and who is able to make this bet is a so far unknown actor: "subjects bloggers." Now, to "read" these bets should not overlook or attempt to attack the new law, or what happens in Venezuela, or what happens with soccer. Could you recommend a book about it, but the release of bibliography for comment.
Almost everyone knows what is referred to when talking about the known Area 51, that portion of land covered by 155 km2 located 170 km north of the city of in Las Vegas Lincoln County Nevada, United States . The name of Area 51 comes from the division that made the U.S. government to administer services, designating a portion of land to B grabbing Nellis Air Force and is now owned by the Ministry of Defence United States and the USAF .
Other names that are known or associated with Area 51 are Watertown, Dreamland , GroomLake , Paradise Ranch, The Farm , Box, among others. So far this base
not have anything special if we fail to consider the conspiratorial air of mystery that many have been generated around this place. The story begins in Roswell N ew Mexico in July 1947 , where a farmer claimed to have found remains of a strange object crashed irrigated on his farm. The press and radio covered the event to point get headlines like "The Air Force captured flying saucer on ranch in Roswell" to not enter such data (which is very extensive) it had to USAF deny the information on the grounds that it would be a military source balloon as part of a secret project denomindo Mogul. Some UFO crash that in fact if there was to the point where the wreckage was recovered as well as 5 bodies ( 2 of them alive) of its crew and taken to a military base secret fuerza aérea, hoy conocida como Área 51 . La historia tiene muchísima data sobre el incidente, con el espíritu de No confundirlo a Ud. estimado lector preferimos compartir con Ud. sólo la casuística más conocida y relevante. A partir de éste incidente es que salta a la palestra lo que antes era una base militar más ahora una base ultrasecreta que alberga la mayor hipótesis de conspiración y ocultamiento del fenómeno OVNI y extraterrestre . Muchos entrevistados sobre el tema, estudiosos e incluso infiltrados han soltado o filtrado información sobre la mítica base, al punto de sugerir que el aeródromo de la superficie would be only the tip of the iceberg because under the ground there would be a huge bunker that houses a known technology testing and study alien races . The truth is that the U.S. government not affirm or deny the existence of the database, but is perhaps Robert "Bob" Lazar who with his explosive allegations in 1998 stoked especulac ion and the mystery of this famous place. Bob Laza r (click to your Web ) was a physicist who worked for 5 months this air base ( 1988). Outside the base surprised the world with his televised statements informing the world that his work consisted in investigating UFO technology rescued 's caught between and 9 12 of them, which was seeking knowledge for use in military applications. According to Bob Lazar an area known as S4 near Papoose Lake in Area 51 would be the place where individual hangars remain in these craft aliens captured. The statements of Bob Lazar included reports that reached his hands on autopsies on bodies Stres extranet, scientific research alien technology and even slipped the suggestive idea that beings from other worlds would interact with humans living in the base. We share with you this interview with Bob Lazar and pay attention to their statements. Watch the Video :
Bob Lazar died some years later under mysterious circumstances ranging from a virus to suicide. Similarly Robert Frost metal worker who worked in Area 51 and Wally Case another employee died in similar circumstances, victims of an unknown virus affecting all tissues decomposing to death cases resulting in court even. statements now a microbiologist Dan Burisch called, which formed part of the Majestic and Aquarius project who claims to have held meetings with what he called a J-ROD (be alien) in the S4 within Area 51 are far strong and is perhaps one of the modern evidence that feed this conspiracy theory of extraterrestrial contact information. Notes The Video :
Now only two witnesses to these are added a lot more of formers Employees (employees) who have had to do directly with the projects developed within the Area 51 , and if we add the countless videos of hundreds of witnesses who have been videotaping the strange lights in the skies around the Area 51 myth becomes even more conplejo and confusing. Watch the Video :
Well, recently it April 10 ( 2009 ) 5 former Area 51 workers have broken their silence and have provided individual statements on their activities within this air base. This is a commander of the complex, a radar, a pilot or evidence, a special projects engineer, and a fuel supply manager who have agreed to speak to journalist Annie Jacobsen . This information published and widely disseminated by the news Los Angeles Times (click to view ) have simply been shattered allegedly Conspiranoids theories hundreds of UFO enthusiasts and track where they have come along the years claiming alien contact hidden. This was reported on the statements of these gentlemen. Notes Videos:
in the letters s ex Former Employees (former employees) argued that if you practice reverse engineering but NO extraterrestrial craft but captured Soviet military aircraft, and on the constant sightings in the area they were mainly a test flight of the famous A-12 Oxcart precursor SR-71 Blackbird known as super that aircraft capable of flying at 80.000 feet and Mach 3.1 . What's really happening here? , What really cooks at Area 51? The immediate logical question is because right now these 5 out the very elderly gentlemen to give statements they intend to demystify what would become the Holy Grail of conspiracy theories in the world do. If we consider the current world situation, call it an international crisis, mainly in U.S. , the susceptible and critical situation with Iran and nuclear base B ushehr close to being ready to produce extremely dangerous nuclear material to the Israeli and American the unpredictable effects of climate around the world and against the current terrorist, attributed to Al Qaeda that sigilozamente operates in major world economic plans marrow preparations for defense and counterattack Americans should be more than ready and prepared to begin operations, would not then perhaps to divert attention but rather to justify the next strange and inexplicable movements (seemingly) in the skies of strange lights and craft flying some military bases as a prelude to a possible enfrentameinto, in the words of the specialists and tionalists would be a step happen. This way 5 respectable gentlemen ease the burden of myth to face the world to tell them N or care more, they alleged UFO 's not exist, much less the alleged aliens base, everything was and is a popular myth simple. Eye dear reader so here they are preparing to hose who follow the information from the north country around these issues we know that where there's smoke there's fire brings the anyway Area 51 is and will be of thousand and theories as well go 5 5oo or more employees to speak, that myth began in 1947 and is now led even to a movie or television has far exceeded the military secret and has already partly convortido UFO folklore of those who want or need to believe, are those who believe and those who not want to find more as they believe that all answers are there in the Area 51 . Contact, dear reader, not be given from a base as you well know, the information circulating on the internet or mass media led the applicant to get lost in the perpetual myth based on a theme that is simpler than many believe, less complex and less conspiratorial and is perhaps in these times that these theories not give for more and already it's time you all come to light but not a base but from which everything started from the very heavens. Research! ____________________________________________________________________
