From the legal actions initiated by the great Argentine daily (you may use the slogan?) Against the blog "What's wrong Clarin (QTPC) shot a series of postings related to freedom of expression, censorship and all that could be related to a massed done mainly by the "subjects bloggers." And yes, I came a new concept.
few days ago saying that the most interesting on this subject that was most dramatic was the new status that this action had given us as bloggers. He said, (...) "Clarín has given us something that no one had hitherto been done: the status of enemy (...).
Living in the south column, we raised this issue with Tux and did the debate about what were the limits of the claim made on account of the use of the mark and the logotype to create a blog that a critique of Clarín. In fact, as can be seen in audio, the case has enough flaws that underlie the claim of media company. The right perspective is interesting, but (there's always a but) the order of conduct is often a path parallel to the ontological and that's the reason I left the cloisters of that power long ago.
The sentence that opens Camilo José Cela his book The Hive says: (...)" not lose perspective, I'm already tired of saying, is all that matters "(...). Although I read it over 10 years is one of the phrases that I always remember it is because if there is something that I lose perspective.
Then, knowing the law as explained by speculations this post we venture into perspective: What's wrong is an allusion Clarín newspaper unavoidable but we know that newspapers are nothing more than media companies. In the current field of what we call media, defined by the balance of power characteristics of the 22,285 and the successive reforms to the Decree 527, is not very simple new players emerging. Some time ago said that the reality of blogging in the case of Argentina should be exemplary and that the map of media companies today was a breeding ground for the emergence of alternative spaces (objective conditions). Occurs NOTICE that if we talk about capital letters, it is known that the means of mass communication misnamed (lower case) now wield dual auto-consecrated to "make believe" and "monitor", are spokespersons for a single, hegemonic sense to it's not as easy sneak. Perhaps as an attempt to construct reality and the event, some individuals or small groups echoed the proposal of Deleuze and generate true "holes" by leaking the unique discourse of the media.
As Polycarp says when he speaks of " streisand effect, the legal maneuvering Clarín understood as a commitment creates a space for the emergence of another bet, step up and who is able to make this bet is a so far unknown actor: "subjects bloggers." Now, to "read" these bets should not overlook or attempt to attack the new law, or what happens in Venezuela, or what happens with soccer. Could you recommend a book about it, but the release of bibliography for comment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment